It brought my wife to tears as we sat on our living room sofa. And I suppose that deserves an explanation. The “it” was the cumulative impact of the week’s news, culminating in the senseless deaths of nine people at a Church Bible study in Charleston at the hands of hatred personified. “It” was simply too much for someone with the gift of mercy, like my wife, Gale, to bear and process. And all of that culminated in genuine tears, much discussion, some personal reflection and some decisions. Oh, yes, it also generated this newsletter.
We live in an age of “media megaphones” and 24/7 news cycles where everything from a car caught in a sinkhole in Florida to a racially motivated church shooting in South Carolina are equally magnified into “Breaking News,” demanding an immediate emotional response without the benefit of careful thought and reflection, or even the opportunity to grieve. Before anything is known about what actually happened, the event is co-opted by agendized politicians, agitators or action committees who further their agenda by blaming it on guns, flags, internet websites, political parties (usually “right wing” politics), or whatever their favorite whipping post might happen to be (and un-wise Christians are quick to join in and take sides). We no longer have meaningful national discussions. Rather, we have polarized (and polarizing) shouting matches, with participants who demand that we choose sides, and moderated by provocateur hosts whose goals are higher ratings, not accurate information or something as elusive as “truth.” The “free speech movement” of the 1960s which was birthed on college campuses like Berkley, is now dying on those same college campuses at the hands of students who protest and boycott any speaker whose views differ from their own, or those of an unruly minority. Welcome to the disturbing rise of a growing “mobocracy.”
Social Media And Our Loss Of “Margins”
This kind of intolerance is spreading to the Christian blogosphere, too. In a recent article for Christianity Today’s “Her.meneutics” popular blogger Amy Julie Baker announced her intention to stop blogging, “Why Bloggers Are Calling It Quits.” One of the top reasons she cited for her decision was“the barrage of ‘haters’ who leave their reckless disagreements and insults in comment sections and replies.” There’s an elegant word for such stuff: “vitriol.” And it’s increasing. Another reason she cited was the loss of meaningful thought. In our digital age, the reality of complex issues is now reduced to 140 characters, the equivalent of a digital bumper sticker. Viral videos, catchy “tweets” and inflammatory rhetoric have replaced meaningful discussion. In the words of Christian apologist Ravi Zacharias, we have now created a generation of people who listen with their eyes (“I saw a video about it, so it must be true”) and think with their feelings. And we are all expected to believe that a video of 200 angry protesters (out of a nation of 300 million people) somehow constitutes a national wave of public opinion. Really? I think not.
I found these two reasons for Baker’s decision to stop blogging (and to start thinking and doing meaningful writing) both authentic and persuasive. They rang true. But it was her third reason which “sealed the deal” for me: We need more “margins” in our lives. OK, I used the term “margins,” not Ms. Baker. But the idea is the same. I want more time in my life to focus on things which are important: meaningful discussions, time to reflect on what it means to be a disciple of the Kingdom, writing another book on discipleship and finding more ways and time to meaningfully serve “the least of these.” And time to reflect on what it means to be a pilgrim and sojourner whose citizenship and hope reside elsewhere. Somewhere other than Vanity-Fair.
Vanity Fair And This Present Evil Age
I recently had an opportunity to re-read parts of “The Pilgrim’s Progress” by John Bunyan. In particular, I read the account of Christian and Faithful and their journey through “Vanity-Fair.” This is Bunyan’s allegorical description of this world in which we as believers are “pilgrims” – “sojourners.” In Bunyan’s theology we are all sojourners through “Vanity-Fair” on our life-journey to the Celestial City. Bunyan writes:
“Then I saw in my dream, that when they were got out of the Wilderness, they presently saw a Town before them, and the name of that Town is Vanity, and at the Town there is a Fair kept, called Vanity-Fair: It is kept all the year long; it beareth the name of Vanity-Fair, because the Town where it is kept is lighter than Vanity; and also, because all that is there sold, or that cometh thither, is Vanity. As is the saying of the Wise, All that cometh is Vanity.”
Much to our collective discomfort, Bunyan’s description of this world as “Vanity-Fair” is consistent with Paul’s description of this world as “the present evil age” (Galatians 1:4). This present age began at creation, was corrupted by mankind’s fall into sin, and will conclude at “the end of the age” when Jesus returns to inaugurate “the age to come” (see Matthew 12:32; 13:39-40, 49; 24:3; 28:20). In describing this present age Paul uses the word poneros, which refers to moral, ethical evil. This present age is “evil” – morally and ethically corrupt at its core – and only the return of Jesus at the end of the age will change that reality. As George Eldon Ladd explains in The Gospel Of The Kingdom (page 31), “It is . . . basic to our understanding of the Kingdom of God to recognize the Biblical teaching that This Age is in rebellion against God’s rule. The New Testament sets The Age To Come in direct opposition to This Age. The present age is evil, but the Kingdom of God belongs to The Age To Come”.
As a result of this spiritual reality, we are faced with a harsh practical reality: all transformations in this present evil age are temporary, because the “spirit of the age” wars against them. The Evangelical Awakening in England under such men as George Whitefield and John and Charles Wesley, profoundly transformed English culture and society for a hundred years (think 1750 – 1850). But today, the names of Whitefield and Wesley and their profound impact are only vague memories, while mosques are replacing churches at an alarming rate in formerly “Christian” England.
But the Kingdom of God abides forever, and that needs to become the “hard center” of our focus. The Kingdom of God embodies God’s “hard reality” which provides both the “hard center” of our focus as well as the framework and motivation for everything we do (at this point I’ll include a shameless plug for my book, And They Dreamt Of A Kingdom: Biblical Reflections On Discipleship And The Kingdom Of God).
A Time To Reconsider
It is time for us to reconsider and to re-focus on the Kingdom of God. In the midst of all the horror and heartache in Charleston, the most powerful manifestation of the Kingdom of God was seen in the worship service held at Emanuel AME Church on the Sunday following the shooting. It embodied, on full display, the Kingdom truths of redemption, forgiveness, reconciliation and perseverance in the face of evil. The domain of darkness and the Kingdom of God faced off in the spiritual arena of that Church, and the Kingdom of God emerged victorious. That victory was on clear display for all to see, for all who weren’t blinded to reality by some other agenda (guns, flags, Dukes of Hazard cars, statues of Jefferson Davis). Isn’t that the side of this cosmic battle for the hearts and souls of our generation that we want to be on when the history and events of this present evil age are judged?
We need a generation of Christians who, like Jeremiah, represent moral and spiritual bronze walls in an age of moral and spiritual mud huts (see Jeremiah 15:20). A generation of Christians who, like Jeremiah, weep for a lost generation; a generation of Rachel Dolezals who have lost their ability to distinguish between reality and illusion; a generation that has lost its sense of race, gender and sexuality as sacred gifts from God to be embraced, nurtured and protected; a generation that has lost its ability to see that the hope for ending violence in America (racial or otherwise) is not in eliminating guns or taking down flags, but by exposing the root of anger, bitterness, hatred and self-love which resides in every human heart and which requires that genuine spiritual transformation which only the Good News of the Kingdom can bring about.
It is time for each and every serious and genuine Christian to reconsider what we believe and what we are manifesting to this generation. I am disturbed and saddened to see an increasing number of professing Christians who are more passionate about attempting to fix the kingdom of men than they are about proclaiming and manifesting the Kingdom of God. Is your opinion concerning gun control, the Confederate flag, “evil” corporations, wall street bankers and the minimum wage the message you want to manifest and communicate to this generation? What are you manifesting to this generation? Are you manifesting liberal or conservative politics, or the Kingdom of God which judges all political systems and calls all men and women everywhere (and, yes, politicians, too) to repent of their sin and rebellion and to yield to the King in faith and obedience? This lost generation does NOT need (and possibly doesn’t actually want) your opinion on all these things (and more I could have listed). But they desperately need the good news of the Kingdom of God which ONLY YOU can share with them. How dare you give them anything less.
Each of us will one day be remembered for something by those we leave behind. What will you be remembered for? If I am remembered at all by those I one day leave behind, I don’t want to be remembered as a liberal or a conservative, a Republican or a Democrat, a Libertarian or an Independent. If I am remembered at all, I want to be remembered as a disciple of the Kingdom; a worshiper of God who loved the Lord his God with all his heart, mind soul and strength; a servant to “the least of these” who loved his neighbor as himself; and as a disciple of the Kingdom who raised up other disciples of the Kingdom. Let everything else we did be little more than forgotten footnotes.
Some Personal Decisions
Yes, I know. It’s time to wrap this up. For me and Gale, what began with a tearful “crisis,” led us to some prolonged discussion, reflection and some decisions. Our first decision was (and is) that we need more margin and less “agendized bombast” in our lives. So, we decided that a good place to start would be to dump our cable tv service. We’ve grown weary of the “700 channels available and nothing worth watching” phenomenon (studies show that most people regularly watch only about 16 channels). There’s more to it, of course. We’re tired of dysfunctionality being portrayed as normal. We’re tired of the increasing volume of programing with occult themes. We’re tired of rancorous, agendized debate, and being told that there are only two positions on every issue. And with today’s Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage, the amount of non-productive but rancorous debate is only going to grow. I’m well informed, I know what I believe and I don’t need the rancor in my life. Our second decision will unfold over the next few weeks. Both Gale and I have decided to “thin the herd” when it comes to our social media. Mind you, we aren’t huge social media addicts to begin with. But we both find our Facebook Newsfeed being filled with more rancorous posts. If your goal in life is to beat the drum for some cause that I don’t care about or genuinely disagree with, please don’t take offense if I un-friend you. I need better margins in my life, and you . . . well, you just may need to get a life. Seriously, dude. Get a life. Let me know when you do, and I’ll add you back. I haven’t yet decided what to do with my Twitter account (@housechurchdog), but I see much the same pattern of tweets and re-tweets on things I simply do not care about. I plan to exit a Facebook house church discussion group for similar reasons. The discussion is seldom productive and the threads themselves are simply not about house church, the Kingdom or making disciples. And all such things (Facebook discussions, Twitter posts) become time and emotional “vampires” which serve to suck the life out of you if you pay them ANY serious attention. I want to devote more time and energy to writing meaningful articles and books, while developing and encouraging greater service to “the least of these.”
It is time for each of us to ask ourselves a very basic question concerning everything in which we are investing our time and energy: What’s that got to do with the Kingdom? If you can’t answer that question without engaging in some impressive mental gymnastics, you had better stop and re-think what you’re doing. Gale and I have, and were going to make some serious changes. I believe we ALL will soon be forced to make some serious changes. Better to make them now than later.
One of the seminal literary figures of the 20th century was T. S. Eliot. Born in 1888 he studied at Harvard and Oxford and eventually won the Nobel Prize for Literature early in his career. But he was an unfulfilled soul who saw the vanity of contemporary life. His search for meaning led him through Hinduism and Buddhism, and finally to Christianity. In 1927 he converted to Christianity. In the same year he penned a poem entitled “The Journey of the Magi” which came to be regarded as autobiographical of Eliot himself. In it he described the search of the Magi for the Christ child as seen and narrated through the eyes of one of the Magi.
The Journey of the Magi
by T.S. Eliot
“A cold coming we had of it,
Just the worst time of the year
For a journey, and such a long journey:
The snow was deep and the weather sharp,
The very dead of winter.”
And the camels galled, sore-footed, refractory,
Lying down in the melting snow.
There were times we regretted
The summer palaces on slopes, the terraces,
And the silken girls bringing sherbet.
Then the camel men cursing and grumbling
And running away, and wanting their liquor and women,
And the night-fires going out, and the lack of shelters,
And the cities hostile and the towns unfriendly
And the villages dirty, and charging high prices.:
A hard time we had of it.
At the end we preferred to travel all night,
Sleeping in snatches,
With the voices singing in our ears, saying
That this was all folly.
Then at dawn we came down to a temperate valley,
Wet, below the snow line, smelling of vegetation;
With a running stream and a water-mill beating the darkness,
And three trees on the low sky,
And an old white horse galloped away in the meadow.
Then we came to a tavern with vine-leaves over the lintel,
Six hands at an open door dicing for pieces of silver,
And feet kicking the empty wine-skins.
But there was no information, and so we continued
And arrived at evening, not a moment too soon
Finding the place; it was (you may say) satisfactory.
All this was a long time ago, I remember,
And I would do it again, but set down
This set down
This: were we lead all that way for
Birth or Death? There was a Birth, certainly,
We had evidence and no doubt. I have seen birth and death,
But had thought they were different; this Birth was
Hard and bitter agony for us, like Death, our death.
We returned to our places, these Kingdoms,
But no longer at ease here, in the old dispensation,
With an alien people clutching their gods.
I should be glad of another death.
Eliot has used the story of the Magi to make a point – how difficult and painful it is to be confronted with a radical change of paradigms. A change of paradigm often, if not usually, feels like death – our death, because we hold to the old paradigm so tenaciously. Dying to self and our traditional ways of doing things (what I am referring to here as “paradigms”) is a painful process, which most people spend their lives trying to avoid.
Reflecting on Eliot’s poem this Christmas season, I found myself thinking about how the various groups of people involved in the Christmas story responded to the radical change of paradigm which confronted them in the birth of Christ. I hope my thoughts and reflections will stimulate you to think about how we in the house church (or simple church, or whatever moniker you are operating under) movement are understanding and responding to the dramatic shift in spiritual paradigms which is taking place today. The nativity stories are found in Matthew 2:1-12 (the Magi), and Luke 2:1-20 (the shepherds & angels). For the sake of space I’ll let you read them on your own. I want to talk briefly about those five groups of people who were involved.
The Magi – Often referred to as “wise men” or “kings” in Christmas tradition, the Magi were, in fact, an hereditary Zoroastrian priesthood, often wielding great religious and political power in the Median, Babylonian, Persian and Parthian empires (right up to the time of Christ). During Israel’s Babylonian captivity Daniel, as a reward for services rendered and in recognition of his profound spiritual gifts, was promoted by the King to the position of Chief of the Magi. As such, Daniel was in a unique position to impart to the magi the prophecies of a coming Messiah (which they remembered, passed on and studied for the next 500 years). But as D.W. Jayne points out, the visit of the magi wasn’t simply a courtesy call from old friends. In the world of the first century the Magi functioned in both a priestly and a governmental role. The early church father Tertullian’s description of them as “wellnigh kings” (fere reges) is close to the truth. They were, in the words of Jayne, “a group of Persian-Parthian king makers.” Jayne goes on to describe how their visit might have been perceived: “In Jerusalem the sudden appearance of the Magi, probably traveling in force with all imaginable oriental pomp, and accompanied by adequate cavalry escort to insure their safe penetration of Roman territory, certainly alarmed Herod and the populace of Jerusalem, as is recorded by Matthew. It would seem as if these Magi were attempting to perpetrate a border incident which could bring swift reprisal from Parthian armies. Their request of Herod regarding him who “has been born king of the Jews” was a calculated insult to him who had contrived and bribed his way into that office.” These Magi, strangers to the Kingdom of God yet spiritually perceptive, saw the signs better than anyone else and somehow understood that a profound change of paradigms was underway. Although their understanding was somewhat flawed due to reasons unique to their own situations, they took the time and the considerable risk of traveling great distances to confirm what they already suspected – that a sign in the heavens signaled the fulfillment of great prophecies and portended profound changes here on earth. The paradigms of this world were about to change. The magi understood. Do we?
The Political Establishment – The story of the Magi leads to the story of the existing political/power structure as embodied in Caesar Augustus and Herod the Great. We can safely say that Caesar Augustus (real name Octavian, the adopted son of Julius Caesar) had no idea that a simple decree to enumerate his empire (i.e., probably to prepare accurate tax rolls) would set the stage for the fulfilment of biblical prophecy and the establishment of the Kingdom of God. The heathen rage and the princes of men devise a vain thing, but God uses the wrath of men to praise Him, simply because He so seldom gets their active cooperation. Caesar was clueless as to God’s dealings (in other words, situation unchanged in 2000 years), although Augustus probably eventually received reports of the Magi and their visit to Jerusalem. What Augustus Caesar could not know (although the Magi probably suspected) was that among the many prophecies being fulfilled that Christmas night was one which declared that the kingdoms of this world would one day become the kingdom of our God and of His Christ (see Daniel 2:31-45).
The paradigms of this world had profoundly changed due not to events in the halls of power but due to events in a stable, and Caesar Augustus was clueless, reminding us once again that profound change seldom originates in the seats of political power. When the powers-that-be finally do become aware of a profound change of paradigms they resist it, even violently, just as Herod the Great did. Herod the Great was many things, but a naive political fool was not one of them. His 35+ year rule over the Jews of Judea was coming to an end. He would be dead in a few short years. His hold on power was slipping and the visit of the Magi confirmed what he already feared – that his paradigm of power was being challenged. The paradigm was indeed changing, beyond Herod’s ability to resist or stop it, but he was still willing to extract a terrible price from those around him in a vain attempt to maintain what could not be maintained. In that respect, was Herod all that much different from us? He fought and resisted what God was doing because it threatened everything he had spent his life to build and achieve. Don’t we do the same?
The Religious Establishment – Like the Magi, for some 500 years the religious establishment of Israel had known and studied the prophecies of a coming Messiah. But during those same intervening years they had also become experts in answering obscure religious questions and turning the 613 requirements of the Law into more than 5,000 religious requirements which held the people of God in practical bondage. They had all the right answers to all the wrong questions. In addition, the Pharisees who controlled the synagogues and the Sadducees who controlled the temple & the governing Sanhedrin, along with the scribes who served both, had made their accommodation with the prevailing power of Rome. The prevailing religious establishment was in no mood for anything that might upset their carefully crafted status quo. The result was spiritual stagnation, religious legalism and blindness even to new stars in the sky announcing the messiah’s birth. When the Magi arrived looking for a king, Herod gathered together the religious establishment and “began to inquire of them where the Christ was to be born.” They had an immediate answer: “In Bethlehem of Judea, for so it has been written by the prophet.” They, too, had probably seen the new star in the sky. They, too, like all Jerusalem, had probably learned of the visit of the Magi searching for a new-born king. But despite knowing all the correct religious answers, they lacked the passion, the curiosity or the spiritual integrity to make the short 5-mile journey to nearby Bethlehem to discover if “The Desire of Ages” had indeed finally arrived. Is our religious establishment (ourselves included) much different today? Profound, God-breathed changes in our spiritual paradigms are underway. And yet, isn’t much, if not most, of the church today bogged down in giving warmed over answers to questions which few in our post-Christian post Modern culture are even asking? And are we in the house church movement doing anything substantially different than the religious establishment around us, other than changing our meeting place and taking over the local Starbucks?
The Shepherds – Throughout Scripture God has a fascinating love for shepherds. Many notable biblical saints were shepherds. The children of Israel were shepherds in the land of Goshen. Moses was a shepherd in the land of Midian. David was a shepherd, as was the prophet Amos. And it is the image of the good shepherd which Jesus used to describe himself in John 10:11 & 14. God seems to be partial toward shepherds. But as well as being a biblical and honorable occupation, it is also a dirty one. It was, for the most part, rugged outdoors work. Shepherds lived with their sheep 24/7. And before long they began to smell like their sheep. For reasons both practical and snobbish, this made them “social outcasts” to be numbered among “the least of these”. There are many aspects of God’s economy and dealings which I don’t understand (that’s an understatement). For example, why didn’t the angels appear to Caesar or Herod? Why didn’t they appear to the religious leaders? That would have been interesting since the Pharisees believed in angels but the Sadducees did not (would such a visitation have ended their intra-mural theological rivalry or have simply fed the fire of controversy? Hmmm). Why shepherds? Perhaps it was because God wanted to ignite a spiritual fire in the minds of ordinary men – the least of these – and ignite a revolution, a spiritual wildfire. He didn’t particularly want to bless either religious or political institutions, which often pride themselves in their ability to put out wildfires, lest they “get out of control” and threaten existing structures & paradigms. Religious leaders (and their secular counterparts) often walk in a sense of “entitlement” which says “God owes us an epiphany, after all, we’re leaders”. Yet for some reason God seems to have a heart for the least among us who walk in no such sense of entitlement. Interesting that the Shepherds did not disappoint. They can be counted among the few who had the personal curiosity and spiritual integrity to leave their comfort zones and make the trip into Bethlehem to actually see what God was doing. And for their efforts they received the blessing: “And the shepherds went back, glorifying and praising God for all that they had heard and seen, just as had been told them.”
Joseph & Mary – It’s difficult to think or write any new ideas concerning these two ordinary people (essentially a carpenter and a peasant girl) called upon by the God of their fathers through angelic messengers to play a role in this divine drama that the most learned religious leader would have found impossible. Nothing in their religious background could have prepared them for what God now called upon them to do. Could the Pharisaical Judaism of the Synagogues prepare Mary to willingly and joyously accept the role of an unwed-mother-to-be in a culture where such behaviour was punishable by the religious establishment with death by stoning? Or could it prepare Joseph for his divine call to obedience in marrying Mary and embracing a lifetime of questions, rumors and enuendos regarding Mary’s faithfulness or Jesus’ legitimacy? It is safe to say that the comfortable religious paradigm in which they, their friends and their families had spent their lives thus far was now being shaken to its very foundation as they were now visited by angels and commanded by God to take steps of faith and obedience outside of any religious “box” they had ever known. The shaking of our religious paradigms today is in small what theirs must have been in large. God is once again calling His people out of their comfortable religious boxes. Are you prepared to respond in faith and obedience, knowing that if you do so your world will profoundly change and that you will probably never be able to go back to what you knew before. Changing paradigms have a way of doing that to us.
The Inn Keeper – One of my first jobs after seminary when Gale & I moved to Spokane was at a local airport hotel. Yep, I was an “inn keeper.” Well, actually, I was a desk clerk on the 3-to-11 pm shift. Late one November evening an elderly gentleman came to the desk looking somewhat disheveled and asking for a room. He explained to me that he had no money or credit cards, but did have a “Money Market Account” draft book and asked if we could accept that in payment (our general policy was no, because such accounts at that time were unreliable). He told me that he had just had eye surgery (one of his eyes was bandaged) and was to catch flight to go and be with his family for the holidays the following day. The rest of the staff urged me to say no – bad risk. But, as the manager on duty at the time, I decided in favor of taking a risk and giving him a room. It was just the right thing to do, I felt. I got him settled in his room, my shift ended and I went home. The next morning I received an early morning phone call from the hotel staff announcing (even celebrating) that the bookkeeper had called the bank and the check was good. Word of my risky good deed had spread. When I went to work later that day I was gently chided by the general manager (a good fellow) for placing the hotel at risk, but the tone of his voice and the expression on his face told me we had done the right thing. I have occasionally thought of that elderly gentleman over the years, even musing as to whether he was an angel unaware (with a bank account?!) who had paid us a visit and tested all of our hearts. In the Gospel account, Luke simply tells us that Mary “gave birth to her first-born son; and she wrapped Him in cloths, and laid Him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn.” We should neither vilify nor idolize the inn keeper (or inn keepers) who turned Joseph and Mary away. They weren’t heartless or cruel people. They were probably just a family business run by ordinary people trying to earn a living, and they were full to capacity (even overflowing) for the evening. How could they know that God Himself was homeless that night at their door, that Angels stood ready to proclaim a birth, that Magi from the east would soon be arriving in search of a King and that political and religious paradigms would be forever changed by events that would now take place in a cattle stall within earshot of a baby’s cry. What a night to be an inn keeper and to have no room! Allow me to use this story to stretch the boundaries of your paradigm. The message of the house church movement is similar and profound. God wants to visit your house. Are you prepared to have your paradigm radically changed? Are you ready to invite Him in?
Conclusion & Personal Application
Where are you in this season of significant paradigm shift in God’s dealings in and through His church today? Do you see a reflection of yourself in the mirror of the five groups of people who participated in the Christmas drama? I would dare to say that, in the midst of this present shaking of existing religious paradigms, there are many believers who feel somewhat like the Magi of T.S. Eliot’s poem:
We returned to our places, these Kingdoms,
But no longer at ease here, in the old dispensation,
With an alien people clutching their gods.
If you are one of those who are “no longer at ease here, in the old dispensation” then allow me to make a suggestion during this Christmas season. Take some time to get alone and stand as an involved observer at the manger of Christ. Consider the participants in this divine drama as it unfolds around you. And ask yourself some simple questions. If I had been at the stable that Christmas night, what would my response have been to the paradigm change unfolding before me? How is my paradigm being shaken, challenged and changed today by God’s unfolding plan for the Ages. And how is my response different from (and hopefully better than) the responses of those around me?
“And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord. And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger. And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying, Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.” (Luke 2:10-14)
© Copyright 2013 Rising River Media
Welcome to our official website. Rising River Media is a non-profit Christian media and publishing company. Our mission is to produce quality media resources in support of organic house churches. We have four basic priorities or goals which guide what we do: 1) To Proclaim the good news of the Kingdom of God, 2) To Raise up and equip committed disciples of that Kingdom, 3) To Plant multiplying organic house churches, and 4) To Serve “the least of these.”
We hope you’ll take a few minutes to check out the resources we offer. Because we’re continually updating those resources, we hope you’ll become a regular visitor.
Don’t forget to interact with us on our blog, “Maurice’s Ground Roast,” which you’ll find in the Menu tabs above.
Don't leave before you sign up for our FREE Newsletter!
Maurice Smith is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, an alumnus of Campus Crusade for Christ, International ("Cru") and an honors graduate of Denver Baptist Seminary where he also served as adjunct faculty. He is an accomplished author of several books on theology, spiritual awakening and organic house church.
Gale Smith serves as the Artistic Director of Rising River Media. Gale is a graduate of Spokane Falls Community College (AA) and Eastern Washington University (BA – Fine Arts). Following graduation Gale joined the staff of Campus Crusade for Christ ("Cru"), serving at their International Headquarters in the Art Department as a graphic designer. Gale is an accomplished and gifted artist in a wide variety of contexts and mediums including graphic design, logos, illustrations, water colors and pastels.
Maurice and Gale met and on Cru Staff and have been married now for 36 years. They reside in Spokane, Washinton and have two adult children. Together they coordinate Rising River Media, a non-profit media and publishing company.